How To Select Personal Injury Lawyer

If you suffered in a personal injury accident that because of someone else’s fault, you should consult with a lawyer to make a claim and get the compensation you deserved.

However, insurance companies will try all their best to take advantage of you if you should decide to sue, so it is not wise for you to personally meet the insurance company without your lawyer present. An experienced personal injury lawyer will know how to successfully negotiate with the insurance company and handle your case.

Anyway, it is really a time consuming and challenging task to select a proper lawyer for yourself. Here are some important qualities for your reference when selecting your lawyer.

Real Account Of Gd ‘business Lobbying Be Made Legal In India’

Group Discussion (GD) is the integral part of final selection process at most of the B-schools.
MBAUniverse.com brings to you a series of real account of GD, PI, WAT round at Top B School for admission in the session 2013-15.

Given below is the realistic account of Group Discussion with 8 candidates for admission to one of the top Business school.

GD topic – Business lobbying be made legal in India.

Areas of Specialty for a Colorado Personal Injury Lawyer

The area of law in which a Colorado personal injury lawyer practices is known as torts. Tort litigation covers civil issues involving product liability, negligence, loss of property and other non-criminal issues. The tort system is thus separate from criminal justice; in general, tort law involves cases between individuals or groups of individuals or between natural persons and legal entities such as corporations, institutions and in some cases, even the government. There can be some overlap between torts and the criminal justice system. For example, someone who commits a murder can also be held liable for wrongful death.

Within the broad area of torts, there are a number of categories that a Denver personal injury lawyer may choose to specialize in:
Negligence: In these cases, there was no provable intent on the part of the accused, or plaintiff; instead, the defendant, or victim, must demonstrate that the plaintiff failed to exercise a duty of care and allowed harm to take place that might have been prevented.
Liability: Such cases involve a manufacturer that distributed a product or provided a service that was defective and resulted in harm or loss. Food poisoning also falls under this category when due improper handling by food workers (at a restaurant, a food processing plant, etc.)
Intentional torts: these are cases in which one person has deliberately inflicted physical or psychological harm on another. These torts can overlap with criminal cases, since they can involve assault and false imprisonment (kidnapping), though criminal charges are filed separately with the state.

This last category also deals with traffic accidents, and is when most people call on the services of a personal injury lawyer.

Arbitration And Conciliation Act In India An Overview

Arbitration, an age old concept in India, is a part of Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR) with other popular ADR processes like Conciliation and Mediation. In India Alternate Dispute Resolution is governed by the Indian Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 which is created on the lines of the Model Law of the UNCITAL (United Nations Commission on International Trade Law). This article identifies certain problem areas of the Arbitration Laws of India, highlights some of the revolutionary decisions by Supreme Court and points out some of the misuses as well.
Problem areas:
Over the past decade, the lofty objective of enacting this Act stands substantially diluted due to various reasons as follows:
a.Inability of parties to exercise their rights explicitly provided under the statute
b.The overdependence on retired judges as arbitrators
c.Expansive delays
d.Considerable expense
e.Legal professionals treating arbitrations as an extension of the court proceedings and converting them to lengthy trials.
f.Exercise of appellate power under Section 34 of the Act – a virtual practice to challenge each and every award irrespective of whether it fits within the limited grounds specified in Section 34.
These render nugatory the stated intent of creating an arbitral process that is fair, efficient and capable of meeting the needs of the specific arbitration resulting in an explosion of litigation as against the stated intent of reducing the same.
Revolutionary decisions:
The Supreme Court, while dealing with such rival contentions has held that interpretation of a contract may fall within the realm of the arbitrator. The Court while dealing with an award would not reappreciate the evidence. An award containing reasons also may not be interfered with unless they are found to be perverse or based on a wrong proposition of law like an error apparent on the face of the award. If two views are possible, it is trite, the Court will refrain itself from interfering. Jurisdiction of the court to interfere with an award made by an arbitrator is limited. On contrary to this, in recent times, the courts were impelled to have fresh look on the ambit of challenge to an award by the arbitrator so that the award does not get undesirable immunity.
The Court also quoted it is correct that courts shall not ordinarily substitute their interpretation for that of the arbitrator. It is also true that if the parties with their eyes wide open have consented to refer the matter to the arbitration, then normally the finding of the arbitrator should be accepted without demur. There is no quarrel with this legal proposition. But in a case where it is found that the arbitrator has acted without jurisdiction and has put an interpretation on the clause of the agreement which is wholly contrary to law then in that case there is no prohibition for the courts to set things right.
While the conclusion may not be so relevant, it is the reiteration of the aforementioned principles that is reassuring. One can only hope that this would guide the hands of all judicial authorities while entertaining appeals under Section 34.
Misuse:
Misuse of the process of Arbitration by companies and parties is also not unheard of and is even prevalent in international commercial arbitration where the arbitration agreement or the arbitration clause may stipulate sole and mixed arbitral commissions. These depend primarily on whether the disputes are to be referred to a single arbitrator or the parties may appoint an arbitrator each with an umpire presiding over the arbitration commission.
Problems as discussed again arise when the party to the agreement in power may force the other party or parties to sign an arbitration agreement or arbitration clause created to cause pecuniary or territorial discomfort to ensure a quicker or unfair settlement. The conclusion is obvious. If arbitration is to survive, ADR lawyers must insist on institutional arbitration to ensure Alternate Dispute Resolution becomes a better alternative to Court litigation.
The USP of resolving disputes through Arbitration was its relative simplicity, economy, speed and privacy. However, over the time it has been observed that Institutional Arbitration through Associations or Societies like The Indian Council of Arbitration (ICA) , Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FICCI), FICCI Arbitration and Conciliation Tribunal (FACT), The Associated Chambers of Commerce and Industry of India (ASSOCHAM) etc. is the best since they conduct Arbitration as per rules laid down which have stood the test of time and where the reputation of the Arbitrator is impeccable while at the same time the parties to arbitration know very clearly what the cost of the said arbitration be.
It is unfortunate that most litigants and parties do not opt for institutional arbitration which has time and again proven its mettle in providing fast, economical and completely impartial resolutions of disputes within the ambit of strongly laid down process and guidelines.

Highly Experience San Francisco Injury Lawyers

The world is full of uncertainties; you can meet with an accident at any time and place; you may fall prey to an accident while going to work or riding up or down the escalator in your office or a public place; whether it is minor or serious injury, you will certainly go for a Personal Injury Law Lawyer to help you settle a claim. It can be fire, defective products, dog bit, slip and fall, car or motorcycle accident and you may suffer serious injuries. After the accident you can be emotionally stressed, hopeless, scared just because of the complexities of laws.

You need not fight this long battle alone; there is highly skilled and experienced Accident Injury Attorney California who can lead you to a successful claim. Your right selection of an attorney will certainly help you maintain your mental calmness since he can maneuver through the ordeal which may seem you impossible and unachievable. In every personal injury case, there are different circumstances, injuries, the parties involved in the accident. When you are facing the most horrific experience of your life, you should not wait for long to contact San Francisco Lawyer Personal Injury; you would not be charged for the initial interview with the lawyer; it would cost you nothing and you will be shown the way how to go ahead with your case. The fee to San Francisco Personal Injury Lawyers is not a matter of great concern because most of the personal injury attorneys work on a fixed percentage on the claim amount. It means when you receive your compensation you are free to pay them off.

Since there are certain legal and time constraints to file a claim; the sooner you contact a qualified and skilled attorney, the better it is; time plays a vital role in an accident as the case may require you to meet eye witnesses and insurance professionals. A seasoned and experienced Personal Injury Attorney San Francisco can fight for a big amount of money as there are different types of compensations which can be sought in your case; it can be your medical expenses, plastic surgery or reconstruction surgery, loss of wages, loss of companionship etc. So, with the help of a professional lawyer, your chance of getting a fair and reasonable amount is increased. It is better not to settle with an insurance company unless you have consulted with San Francisco Injury Lawyers because, at time, there can be later complications of some injuries and you will not qualify for a compensation for them.

K2 Legality

Even though K2 products do not contain any controlled substances, many states have already adopted legislation making the same laws that apply to marijuana or other controlled substances also apply to K2 products. Those states that have adopted legislation making K2 illegal are Kansas, the first state to ban K2, Iowa, Missouri, Arkansas, Kentucky, Alabama, Michigan, and Illinois (K2 will remain legal in that state until the end of 2010.) So, this means that in the other 42 states, K2 is still legal.

Many people question why K2 legality should even be an issue. After all, as has already been mentioned, there are no controlled substances in K2 like there are in marijuana and other drugs that are considered illegal. Except for those K2 products which do have synthetic chemicals added to them, the herbs and botanicals found in them are natural. The herbs are the same as those cultivated for use in a home or restaurant kitchen, or that grow wild. The same holds for the botanicals-which is just a “dressed-up” word for plant parts. The plants that are chosen to be combined with the herbs grow naturally indifferent parts of the country or the world.

It is known that some herbs and plants have medicinal properties, and some do contain natural substances that may have an effect on some people. For example, an herb with the very descriptive common name of “Horny Goat Weed” comes from China. Its real name is Epimedium. The Chinese have long believed this plant has aphrodisiac properties. One type of K2 product, SolidSex, has this plant in it, along with herbs and other plants.

Arizona Bankruptcy Attorney- Which Is Better, Bankruptcy or Debt Settlement

When hiring an Arizona bankruptcy attorney you need to know which form of debt settlement is best for you. In this article we will talk about the difference in debt settlement and bankruptcy and which is better?

That is such a good question, and on that bankruptcy attorneys all the time. Most people facing debt problems want to do the right thing. They want to pay their debt. And if they are able to and they have the means to do it, I’d suggest they do it. But the majority clients simply don’t have the means to pay it.

But first so we’re clear on this, let me give you a brief explanation of it.